TMI Blog1937 (4) TMI 23X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nounced by the High Court in the present case on March 28, 1935, this Board has had occasion to consider the interpretation of the words, Hindu undivided family as employed in Sec. 55 of the Indian Income Tax Act, in the case of Kalyanji Vithal Das v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bengal, in which the judgment of their Lordships was delivered on November 30, 1936. In that case the meaning of those ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... His Majesty that the appeal should be allowed, and the order of March 28, 1935, be reversed; that it should be found in answer to the first question as follows:- That in the circumstances of the case the income received by right of survivorship by the sole surviving male member of a Hindu undivided family can be taxed in the hands of such male member as his own individual income for the purp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
