9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (4) TMI 1413X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ran, DR ORDER Per Smt. P. Madhavi Devi, J.M. Both the appeals are filed by the assessee for the A.Y 2012-13 & 2013-14 respectively. In both the years, the assessee is aggrieved by the orders of the CIT (A) in confirming the assessment of income by the AO at 5% of the cost of the goods sold. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee, who is running a retail liquor outlet, has filed hi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... come without rejecting the assessee's books of account and therefore, the estimation is not sustainable. Further, he also submitted that the assessment of income at 5% of the stock of the goods sold is on a higher side and prayed for a lower rate of profit to be estimated. 4. The learned DR however, supported the orders of the authorities below. 5. Having regard to the rival contentions and the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mation at 5% to the cost of the goods sold, in our opinion is on a higher side. The Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in a number of cases, to which J.M. is a signatory, have been following the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in the case of CIT vs. Shri Kamlekar Shankar Lal in ITTA No.21 of 2013 dated 23.07.2013 wherein the Hon'ble High Court has held that a uniform pr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
