Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (11) TMI 899

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... erials subsequently and such escalated cost should have been taken into consideration - Held that:- The appellant had already discharged the additional differential duty as also the fact that the duty paid by the assessee was being availed as credit by M/s.Asian Paints Ltd., thus leading to a revenue neutral situation. The legal issue also sands decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in favour of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... common order, as they arise out of the same impugned order passed by the authorities below, vide which demand of duty of ₹ 2,03,421/- and ₹ 43,684/- stands confirmed against M/s. Padmaja Laboratories under Section 11A(2) of the Act, along with imposition of penalty, under Section 11AC of the Act. Further, penalty of ₹ 20,000/- stands imposed upon M/s. Asian Paints Ltd. 2. As p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... evenue was of the view that there was escalation of the raw-materials subsequently and such escalated cost should have been taken into consideration. Accordingly, Revenue initiated proceedings against them by way of issuance of two show-cause notices, one by invoking longer period and the other within the normal period of limitation. During the course of adjudication, the appellant brought to the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e neutral situation, we note that the legal issue also sands decided by the Hon ble Supreme Court in favour of the assessee, in the case of CCE, Pune Vs. Mahindra Ugine Steel Ltd., reported in 2015 (318) ELT 592 (SC) . It was held that the provisions of Rule 8 of Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Prices of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000, is not applicable to the valuation required to be do .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates