TMI Blog1919 (8) TMI 1X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he appeal involves some substantial question of law. 2. A point was taken on behalf of the plaintiff that the decree of the High Court was not one passed on appeal within the meaning of Clause (a) of Section 109 of the Civil Procedure Code. 3. The order of Mr. Justice Greaves, against which the appeal was directed, was made on the 26th July 1918. 4. On the 30th August 1918, the last day ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dismissed with costs. 7. Having regard to the above-mentioned facts, I think we cannot hold that the order was pot one passed on appeal. 8. I do not think that, having regard to the facts of this case, it is covered by the case Karsondas v. Gangabai 32 B. 108 : 9 Bom. L.R. 566, which was sited by the learned Counsel, Mr. Mitter, on behalf of the plaintiff. 9. In that view, the decree wa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dance with the rule. 11. On the other hand, the point raised on behalf of the defendant was that a period between the 7th August 1918 and the 3rd September 1918, should be excluded from the period of limitation as time requisite for obtaining a copy of the order. 12. Even if there is a question of law involved, I have considerable doubt whether there is any substance in it, having regard to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
