9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (12) TMI 95X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor For the Petitioner : Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate For the Respondents : Shri Manish Sharma, Advocate ORDER PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J. 1. Appellant would assail the order passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (henceforth 'the Tribunal') on 19-1-2018, which, in turn, was preferred to assail the order-in-original No.C ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ing chart : S.No. Particulars of goods Stock as per Book (MT) Qty. found in stock verification (MT) Qty. of surplus stock (MT) 1 Angle/Channel/Joist 7364.512 8358.592 (+) 994.08 2 Bloom/Billet (Rolling Mill) 3894.873 4053.910 (+) 159.037 3 Bloom/Billet (SMS) 944.481 1076.560 (+) 132.079 4. The appellant was issued show cause notice on 31-12-2012 on the ground that the goods we ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , channel and joist has not been properly appreciated by the appellate Tribunal in its true perspective, which has resulted in an error of jurisdiction. 6. On perusal of the document it would appear that out of total surplus stock of blooms/billets to the tune of 159.037 MT about 116 MT appears to have been manufactured on 12-7-2012, as claimed by the appellant, because the record would reveal th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s were manufactured in trial run and did not meet the necessary specifications. Since the quantity of 994.080 MT was found to be considerable the appellate Tribunal concluded that it stands on a different footing then billet/bloom. Liability to make payment of central excise duty arose the moment excisable goods are manufactured, but the appellant did not make payment of the goods from May, 2012, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
