TMI Blog2018 (12) TMI 442X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Excise and Taxation Department, Ludhiana was transferred through RTGS in different accounts of the proprietors. Petitioner is one of the proprietors along with Smt. Sangeeta Garg, Umesh Garg, Seema Garg and Saiyarh Garg. Direction to videograph the proceedings of interrogation - Held that:- Petitioner was summoned on various occasions for making necessary arrangement for videography. Petitioner did not appear on any of the occasion intentionally and he did not comply with the directions. Petitioner deliberately avoided the investigation in order to escape from the proceedings. Summons were issued to the petitioner on nine occasions, but he did not turn up. All these facts were noticed in the earlier petition while declining the prayer f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ief of anticipatory bail cannot be granted to the petitioner. However, petitioner would be at liberty to seek regular bail in accordance with law. Consequently, this petition is dismissed. - CRM-M No.30266 of 2018 - - - Dated:- 19-7-2018 - MR RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. For The Petitioner : Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate For The Respondent : Mr. Lokesh Narang, Sr. Panel Counsel for Union ORDER RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. [1]. Petitioner is in his 3rd attempt for seeking anticipatory bail in case bearing Complaint No.COMA-15-2017 in ECIR No.06 dated 14/08/2013 registered under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of the Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the PMLA Act') at Zonal Office, Jaland ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Resultant FIR No.126 dated 26.07.2013 was registered for the offences under Sections 177, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 IPC at Police Station Division No.5, Civil Lines Ludhiana. [7]. In the aforesaid FIR, petitioner was also nominated as an co-accused on the ground that an amount of ₹ 70,000/- came to his share. Petitioner was arrested in the said FIR and was granted regular bail. Thereafter proceedings in terms of ECIR were initiated under Sections 3 and 4 of the PMLA Act. Petitioner was summoned. Provisional assessment of the property was ordered by the ECIR Authority on 09.05.2016 and complaint was filed before the adjudicating authority. The provisional assessment of the properties of Raman Kumar Garg and Sheena Garg was made absolu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n i.e. CRM-M No.12008 of 2017 while declining the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail vide order dated 11.05.2017. Those proceedings were conspicuously concealed in the earlier petition as the rigor of non-appearance in the investigation would definitely go against the petitioner. Only a reference was made in para no.5 of aforesaid petition that a civil writ petition No.3314 of 2015 was filed by the petition which was disposed on 22.12.2015. A review petition is pending. Owing to the conduct of the petitioner, this Court did not grant any indulgence in the earlier petition. [10]. Petitioner is a beneficiary of the amount which was deposited through RTGS in different accounts. Remaining part of proceeds are still to be identified and at ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
