1968 (12) TMI 107

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Court at Delhi is governed by the decision of this Court in Bahadur Singh v. Muni Subrat Dass [1969]2SCR432 . 2. The facts out of which the present appeal arises are these. One Raghunath Sharma, predecessor-in-interest of the appellants hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff--instituted on February 7, 1956, suit No. 53 of 1956 in the Court of Sub-Judge 1st Class, Delhi, for the eviction of hi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r of the plaintiff against the defendant, the decree will be executable after the 31st December, 1958, if the defendant does not give possession till then. (b) The standard rent of the premises be fixed at ₹ 40/- per mensem, instead of ₹ 50/- paid at present payable from the 1st July, 1956, till the defendant vacates the premises. (c) The amount in deposit with this Court b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t, 1952 (XXXVIII of 1952), (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and hence the decree was a nullity. He failed the Sub-Judge, and also on appeal before the Senior Sub-Judge, Delhi. 7. The High Court, on revision, held that the decree was a nullity as the order passed on the basis of the compromise did not indicate that any of the statutory grounds mentioned in Section 13 of the Act existed. In B .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X