TMI Blog1998 (2) TMI 63X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the order of the Income-tax Officer was not erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue ?" The Commissioner of Income-tax had for that assessment year initated proceedings under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as he felt that the order of assessment made by the Income-tax Officer on February 28, 1977, was prejudicial to the Revenue inasmuch as the value of the construction put up by the assessee had been understated and the low valuation offered by the assessee in the view of the Commissioner, had not been sufficiently revised having regard to the size of the construction and the rentals received from that construction. The assessee had reported that the construction put up was at a cost of Rs. 60,000 and had also f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... jurisdiction under section 263, nevertheless it was a case of the Commissioner clutching at the jurisdiction, the Tribunal came to that conclusion, on the ground that the earlier order of assessment had not been sought to be revised by the Commissioner and that the revision of the later order was not really called for as that later order had been passed pursuant to a direction given by the Tribunal in an appeal which had been preferred by the assessee. The Tribunal also took the view that the valuation report which was furnished after the order of assessment was made could not properly be taken note of by the Commissioner for the purpose of exercising his jurisdiction under section 263. Learned counsel for the Revenue submitted that the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ade an enquiry if he considers the order to be erroneous then he can pass the order thereon as the circumstances of the case justify. Obviously, as a result of the enquiry he may come into possession of new material and he would be entitled to take that new material into account. If the material, which was not available to the Income-tax Officer when he made the assessment could thus be taken into consideration by the Commissioner after holding an enquiry, there is no reason why the material which had already come on record though subsequently to the making of the assessment cannot be taken into consideration by him. Moreover, in view of the clear words used in clause (b) of the Explanation to section 263(1), it has to be held that while ca ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
