9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (1) TMI 610X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... unsel ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of the respondent dated 19.07.2018, rejecting the petitioner's refund claim. 2.The petitioner assessee sought refund of integrated tax to the tune of Rs. 75,67,642/- based on certain reasons and grounds raised in the application for refund, one submitted through online on 14.06.2018 and another submitted in person on 19.06.2018. A de ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... was passed reiterating the very same reason stated in the said deficiency memo. 3.Mr.P.Rajkumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that when the petitioner has explained in detail as to how the deficiencies pointed out in the Memo dated 04.07.2018 are not factually correct, the respondent is not justified in reiterating the very same reasons in the impugned order, without looking into ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tances of the case. 5.Heard both sides. 6. The petitioner seeks for refund of integrated tax paid already based on certain reasons and grounds, as set out in their application for refund. This Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the merits of the refund claim, as it is for the respondent to consider and decide. Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pointed out by the respondent are either improper or not warranted. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the respondent should consider the application already filed by the petitioner once again on merits based on the petitioner's reply dated 13.07.2018 and also after affording a personal hearing to the petitioner. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed and the impugned order is set ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
