TMI Blog1914 (7) TMI 1X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... egam v. Husaini Khanaum I.L.R. (1913) A. 195. 26 M.L.J. 474 and if there are some observations in Rose Ammal v. Rajaratna Ammal I.L.R. (1898) M. 33 which cannot be reconciled with that ruling, those o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... remain in possession for the seven years term agreed upon between themselves and the mortgagors and hence they cannot be redeemed by the appellant (3rd defendant) who is a purchaser of the mortgagors& ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
