TMI Blog2019 (1) TMI 1291X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... espondents have not given any opportunity to the petitioners to establish their case and they have not considered the documents produced by the petitioners - They have unilaterally taken a decision and passed the impugned order at Annexure-A. There is violation of principles of natural justice. To give one more opportunity to the petitioners Annexure-A dated 15.02.2012 is treated as show-cause notice - petition disposed off. - W.P.Nos.27052-27053 OF 2012(GM-RES) - - - Dated:- 3-1-2019 - Mr. Justice H.T. Narendra Prasad For the Petitioners : By Sri. B.G. Chidananda Urs, Advocate for Smt. Rukmini Menon, Advocate For the Respondents : Sri. H. Jayakara Shetty, CGC, Sri. Y. Hari Prasad, CGC ORDER The petitioners have ch ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... de Policy the petitioner is entitled for deemed export benefits. As per the Foreign Trade Policy the petitioners have applied for deemed export benefit and they have furnished the relevant documents to show that they have imported the components and assembled the same in India and supplied the finished product to the second petitioner. The respondents, without considering the documents submitted by the petitioners and without giving any notice, unilaterally taken a decision on the basis of the meeting held on 27.01.2012 issued Annexure-A dated 15.03.2012 stating that the first petitioner is not entitled for deemed export benefit. Being aggrieved by the same, petitioners have filed these petitions. 4. Sri B.G.Chidananda Urs, learned couns ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... itled for any relief. 6. Sri Y.Hariprasad, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.5 has adopted the arguments advanced on behalf of learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. 7. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the writ papers. 8. The specific case of the petitioners is that the first petitioner has imported various components from outside the country, assembled the same in India and supplied the finished product to the second petitioner. To establish their case they have also furnished the relevant documents to the respondents to show that they are manufacturers as defined in para 9.36 of the Foreign Trade Policy and as per para 8.2 they are entitled for deemed export benefit. The respondents hav ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
