Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1997 (5) TMI 14

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ghing 291.500 gms. from the assessment of the assessee and holding its value as unexplained investment by the assessee when such ornaments were found in the possession of Smt. Amrit Bai, her statements were recorded, the claim was accepted by the Commissioner of Income-tax in the order under section 132(12), Smt. Amrit Bai was assessed to wealth-tax for the assessment years 1981-82 to 1987-88 and onwards and there was no evidence that the assessee made investment during the previous year under assessment? 2. Whether, the learned Tribunal was right in law in not excluding the old gold ornaments of children of the family weighing 95-720 gms. from the assessment of the assessee and holding its value as unexplained investment by the assessee .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ssessee, was married in the lifetime of the assessee's father and she had been given ornaments by the assessee's father? 6. Whether the learned Tribunal was right in law in holding that the amount to be added under section 69 shall be different than the value of unexplained asset computed or computable under the Wealth-tax Act? 7. Whether the learned Tribunal was justified in law in holding 512.460 gms. of old ornaments as unexplained, in computing its value at Rs. 93,054 and in sustaining addition of such amount under section 69 of the Act? 8. Whether the learned Tribunal had material to hold that ornaments of wife of the assessee, children of the family, etc., found in different rooms in the ancestral house remained unexplained and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 855 kgs. 4. Fixed deposits : Rs. 1,500 Nil 5. Debtors Rs. 2,61,310 Nil ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- After recording the statement of the family members of the petitioner under section 132(4) of the Act, a summary order was passed under section 132(5) on December 23, 1983. The assets seized were retained by the Department. On appeal against the order dated December 23, 1983, the Commissioner of Income-tax exercising the power under section 132(12) passed an order on June 14, 1984, and recorded a finding that certain assets were found to be duly explained. But that order was passed without prejudice to any proceedings .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... unt of the appellant's father showing payment of Rs. 1,001 made in S. Y. 1995 to Shri Jorawarmal. 2. Declaration given by Shri Dev Chand Doshi, eldest son-in-law of Shri Jorawarmal, confirming the payment made by him to the appellant in S. Y. 2002. 3. Affidavit of Shri Dev Chand confirming the handing over of Rs. 3,000 to the appellant. 4. Affidavit of Shri Badamilal, son of Shri Nawal Chand, confirming the payment made of Rs. 3,000 by Shri Dev Chand to the appellant in the S. Y. 2002. 5. Affidavit of Shri Jodhkaran, son of Shri Ratanlal, confirming the payment of Rs. 3,000 by Shri Dev Chand to the appellant. 6. Affidavit of Shri Manu Ram claiming sale of milk on behalf of the appellant for the last 20 years. 7. Copies of variou .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d not interfere on a reference unless it appears that there was no evidence before the Tribunal upon which any reasonable man could come to the conclusion to which they have come. Apart from this if the Tribunal has recorded a finding by referring to all the evidence, whether it is sound or not, the cumulative effect of all the facts leading to the finding are only to be looked into. None of the other cases cited above, is of any assistance to the assessee inasmuch as we are also convinced that the evidence to which the reference has been made by learned counsel, if discussed, as he wanted it to be discussed, would not have changed the view taken by the Tribunal. Under these circumstances, we are of the view that the order rejecting the r .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates