Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1998 (6) TMI 87

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a depreciation at the rate of 40 per cent. on the trucks owned by him. The petitioner's case was that since the trucks had been used by the petitioner in transportation business, he was entitled to 40 per cent. depreciation on the trucks as per the circular of the Central Board of Direct Taxes as well as the Income-tax Rules. But the said case of the petitioner was turned down by the Assessing Officer in the assessment order and instead, depreciation at 30 per cent. was allowed on the trucks of the petitioner. Against the said assessment order, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Gauhati, who, in his order dated January 10, 1990, allowed 40 per cent. depreciation. Against the said order of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... said application of the petitioner after noting its findings in its appellate order that the assessee could not establish that the trucks were hired out to other parties or they were used in his business of transportation of goods on hire. Mr. R. K. Joshi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-assessee, submitted that the ground given by the Tribunal for rejecting the prayer of the petitioner is factually not correct as the petitioner-assessee had in fact established before the authorities that the trucks of the petitioner were in fact used for transportation business. In support of his submission, Mr. Joshi relied on the relevant paragraphs of the order dated January 10, 1990, of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) as well as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ate Tribunal, Gauhati Bench, Guwahati, in I. T. A. No. 227 (Gauhati) 1990, we are of the opinion that the rejection of the prayer of the petitioner for reference of the aforesaid two questions was not justified and that this is a fit case in which this court should call for a statement of the case from the said Tribunal on the aforesaid two questions of law. In the result, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Gauhati Bench, Guwahati, is directed to draw up a statement of the case after giving due opportunity to the parties and send the statement of case on the two questions of law, quoted above to this court as early as possible. This application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, stands disposed of. - - TaxTMI - .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates