TMI Blog2019 (2) TMI 1150X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s passed including the sentence “no interim relief” - It appears that, due to the said deliberate miscommunication by the applicant dated 26.11.2018, the Investigating Agency refrained itself from either arresting or interrogating the applicant. The deplorable practice adopted by the applicant and his Advocate is deprecated. This Court is of the considered view that the applicant does not deserve to be protected by prearrest bail - application dismissed. - ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2333 OF 2018 - - - Dated:- 13-12-2018 - A.S. GADKARI, J. Mr. Ganesh Gole I/b Ritesh Ratnam for applicant. Mr. Shyam Walve I/b Ram Ochani for Respondent No.1. Mr. Ajay Patil, APP for State. P.C.: 1] The applicant is apprehend ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ttled. The said specious plea is recorded herein only for its rejection at the threshold as it is dehors of any merits. It is true that the said Act enacted by the Parliament is a new statute, but with an intention to establish easy process of revenue collection. However, some unscrupulous elements in the Society like the applicant by exploiting loopholes in the said Act are causing wrongful loss to the Government Exchequer and enriching themselves. The custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary not only to unearth the entire truth behind the present crime, but also to investigate the modus operandi adopted by the applicant along with other accused persons who are involved in the crime and the same is not possible without ther ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not stated in the said letter that there is no interim relief granted in favour of the applicant. The Order dated 24.11.2018 clearly indicates that, the said Advocate Mr. Ritesh Ratnama himself appeared on 24.11.2018 before this Court and in his presence the said Order was passed including the sentence no interim relief . 8] It appears that, due to the said deliberate miscommunication by the applicant dated 26.11.2018, the Investigating Agency refrained itself from either arresting or interrogating the applicant. The deplorable practice adopted by the applicant and his Advocate is deprecated. 9] In view of the above and after taking into consideration the conduct of the applicant, gravity of offence and the serious allegation against ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
