Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (4) TMI 1656

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... excise duty leviable on such goods cannot be misconstrued as duty of customs and the legal reality is that the duty levied under Section 3 of the Central Excise Act on the goods manufactured by 100% EOU is Central Excise only even when the measure of levy is the Customs duty. The Government is fully convinced that entire duty paid by the applicant in respect of the inputs at the rate of 21% is duty of excise only and the rebate of the same is allowed under Rule 18 of the C.E.R., 2002 and Notification No. 21/2004-C.E. (N.T.), as the compliance of these two governing provisions are not doubted by the lower authorities also in his case - The splitting of the central excise duty into B.C.D. and V.D. and to confuse the entire matter was whol .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on has been filed mainly on the ground that EOUs are governed by the provisions of Section 3 of the Central Excise Act which provides for levy of Central Excise duty on excisable goods from EOU and, therefore, rebate of full duty of excise paid by them is admissible to them. They have also placed reliance on the following case laws : (i) Kumar Arch Tech Pvt. Ltd. - 2013 (290) E.L.T. 372 (Tri.-L.B.) (ii) Vikram Ispat - 2000 (120) E.L.T. 800 (Tri.-L.B.) (iii) Metaclad Industries - 2013 (289) E.L.T. 381 (Tri.-Mumbai) 3. Personal hearing was held on 5-4-2018. Sh. S.J. Vyas, Advocate, appeared for personal hearing on behalf of the applicant and reiterated the grounds of revision as stated above. 4. The Government has exa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the Central Excise Act on the goods manufactured by 100% EOU is Central Excise only even when the measure of levy is the Customs duty. A large bench of CEGAT in the case of Vikram Ispat v. CCE, Mumbai-III - 2000 (120) E.L.T. 800 (Tribunal-L.B.) has also clearly held that duty levied on the goods manufactured and cleared by 100% EOU to the D.T.A. is a duty of excise and not a duty of customs on account of a measure being the Customs duty provided in proviso to Section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Accordingly, the Government is fully convinced that entire duty paid by the applicant in respect of the inputs at the rate of 21% is duty of excise only and the rebate of the same is allowed under Rule 18 of the C.E.R., 2002 and Notifica .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates