Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (2) TMI 1404

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tice dated 20/04/2011, Rs. 1,04,77,664/- vide Show Cause Notice dated 21/10/2011 and Show Cause Notice dated 21/12/2012 amounting to Rs. 1,58,88,820, respectively which in aggregate works out at Rs. 12,06,61,504/- under the various provisions of Finance Act, 1994 (hereinwith referred to as 'Act') 2. The facts of the case are that the appellant is registered with the Service tax commissionerate STC No. AAFCA5305CST001 dated 24/03/2006 for 'erection, commissioning or installation services' which is leviable to service tax with effect from 1/07/2003, consultation services/ commercial or industrial', which is leviable to service tax with effect from 10/09/2004, and 'consulting engineering service' which is leviable to service tax with effect f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ing/ commissioning/ distribution boards/ lighting/ fixture/ feeder pillars/fire deduction system/ music system and public address system and other electrical and electronic devises, and wiring of telephone, computer and telephone, point wiring, earthing, ( mains/ sub mains) etc., in civil structure such as industrial and commercial structure, the Government building the airports, hospitals( private as well as Government), educational institute etc. 4. After scrutiny of various contracts, the above show Cause Notices were issued to the appellant asking the payment of duty as indicated under the provisions of Act, and the provisions of Rules and also under Section 66 and 68 of Finance Act, 1994 ( as amended by section 95) read with Section 9 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... law by denying the benefit of Notification No. 12/2003-ST dated 20/06/2003, on the ground that the copy of the Sales tax returns/ profit and law accounts/ invoices have not shown the sale of goods/ mentioned separately. (iv) It is also submitted that the appellant is not liable to service tax in respect of those projects on which service tax has been discharged under 'work contract composition scheme' and also that the impugned order is not sustainable as it levied service tax on the pure sale of the goods and trading activities, which is un-constitutional and contrary to the provisions of the Act. 6. It is also submitted that the impugned order has also charged the service tax by including the amount of VAT/sales tax charged by the appe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tenable as the same is meant for personal use and outside the ambit of WCS 88,88,732 1,37,832 10,724 90,37,288 8. Without prejudice to above, demand of Rs. 19,38,375/- is liable to dropped on the basis of incorrect calculation. The abatement of the 67 % as per the Notification 12/2003-ST was also required to be provided by the Adjudicating Authority while adjudicating the case. The Adjudicating Authority has also erred in charging the service tax on paid tax on the amount under the composition scheme/ Rule 2A of Service Tax Composition Rule. Also the computation of demand prior to 1/06/2007, is not liable to be included in the said order in view of Hon'ble Supreme Court decision in case of Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Larsen and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt and also following the ration laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of L & T and other judgments as indicated above. 10. Ld AR, on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the ground contained in the impugned order for confirmation of demand. 11. After considering the rival submissions and perusal of case records, we find that the impugned order is having various infirmities as raised by the Ld.CA on behalf of the appellant. The service provided by the appellant pertain to 'work contract services' which is leviable for service tax only after 1/06/2007, and therefore, the demand prior to 01/01/2006 to 31/05/2007 is liable to be dropped. Similarly the demand in respect of pure trading of trading goods is also not sustainable as the same fal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates