TMI Blog2019 (4) TMI 7X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Hon’ble Supreme Court, therefore, we do not find any merit in the objection of the learned Counsel for the Revenue, that unless the typographical rectification of the amount shown in the Order is carried out, the order may be misunderstood by the adjudicating authority. Further such apprehension has been allayed by the Ld. advocate for the respondent mentioning that they would not take such a ple ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rectification of typographical error in the order dated 31/07/2018. 3. It is the contention of Ld. Spl. Counsel for the Revenue that the total amount involved in respect five show-cause notices, subject matter of the Appeal before this Tribunal is ₹ 138.00 crore, approximately, which has been wrongly mentioned as ₹ 1.38 crore in the said Order. Therefore, the revenue sought rectific ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the matter has been remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication of the demands raised against the show cause notices issued by the Department to the respondent. 5. Learned Senior Counsel for the Revenue submits that the respondent may take a plea and also the learned Commissioner may mis-understand the order and confine himself to adjudicate the issues limiting the demands to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Counsel for the Revenue, that unless the typographical rectification of the amount shown in the Order is carried out, the order may be misunderstood by the adjudicating authority. Further such apprehension has been allayed by the Ld. advocate for the respondent mentioning that they would not take such a plea in the de novo proceeding. 8. In these circumstances, deciding the issues whether the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
