TMI Blog2018 (10) TMI 1660X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hat case not maintainable in view of the fact that the Notification dated 24.05.2017 travels beyond the scope of the removal of difficulties provision is correct. We are of the view that, having held that the appeal is not maintainable, the appellate Tribunal should not have adjudicated upon either the limitation aspect of the case or the merits of the particular Scheme before it. Therefore, w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... vanshi, AOR Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Akshat Kumar, AOR Mr. Ajay K. Jain, Adv. Mr. Atanu Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Yash Karan Jain, Adv. Mr. Neeraj Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. K.K.R. Das, Adv. Ms. Mayuri Raghuvanshi, AOR Mr. Sachin Sharma, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Deepak Biswas, Adv. Ms. Sanya Dua, Adv. Ms. Anannya Ghosh, AOR ORDER 1) Delay condoned. 2) Having heard learned counse ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e set aside the judgment insofar as it purports to deal with the limitation aspect of the case and the merits including the declaration of the Scheme as being illegal. 3) Insofar as Civil Appeal No. 8247 of 2018 and Civil Appeal D. No. 33241/2018 are concerned, it is clear that on the facts in these cases, originally, the appellants had approached the High Court of Delhi in writ petitions. The ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
