Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (4) TMI 732

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ide. Refund allowed - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. - APPEAL NO: ST/85859/2018 - A/85606/2019 - Dated:- 28-3-2019 - Dr. Suvendu Kumar Pati, Member (Judicial) Shri Kishor Chaudhari, Chartered Accountant for appellant Shri S.B. Mane, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for respondent ORDER Rejection of refund claim of unutilized Cenvat credit, accumulated against export of services, by the Commissioner (Appeals-Thane), GST Central Excise, Mumbai is assailed in this appeal. 2. Factual backdrop of the case is that appellant is engaged in exporting consultancy engineering services who filed refund claim of Rs.3,35,156/- on 13 February 2014 for the period between October 2012 to March 2013 but the sam .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... learly indicates that anything divided by zero would be undeterminable. 4. Apart from that, Learned Counsel for the Appellant argued that it is a settled principle of law and followed by many Tribunals as a judicial President, including the one reported M/s. Kijiji (India) P. Ltd v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-I, (2013 29 Tax mann Comm. 252 Mumbai, CESTAT, that in case of export of services, such nexus is not required to be established besides the facts that Board's circular on simplified scheme for refunds also is not in favour of establishment of such co-relationship. In placing reliance to judicial decisions reported in [2016 (4) TMI 112]-CESTAT Mumbai, [2015 (6) TMI 964]-CESTAT Mumbai, [2015 (37) S.T.R. 321] -CESTAT Mu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of Commissioner (Appeals) is uncalled for. 6. Heard from both the sides and peruse the case record. Appellant had filed the refund claim under notification no. 27/2012-C(NT). Para 2 (e) of the said notification reads as follows:- (e) in respect of the services, for the purpose of computation of total turnover, the value of export of service shall be determined in accordance with clause (D) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 5 of the said rules. (D)-Export turnover of services mean the value of the export service calculated in the following manner, namely:- Export turnover of services= payments received during the relevant period for export services+ export services whose provision has been completed for which payment had bee .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 156/-, it should have got that much amount as refund. Further to a query made by this Court, Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted in writing that advance payment received during the relevant period for export of services was ₹ 2,246/- USD and having examined the Foreign Exchange remittance note produced before him, Learned Commissioner (Appeals) had given is finding that the refund claim was filed within the stipulated period of one year. This being so, I am of the considered view that appellant is entitled to get the refund of unutilized Cenvat credit since no nexus is required to be established for export of services and the order of Commissioner (Appeals) in holding that no refund is payable to the appellant on the basis of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates