TMI Blog2019 (4) TMI 896X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Shri Anil Choudhary, DC (AR), Authorised Representative for the Respondent ORDER PER: D.M. MISRA Heard both sides. This miscellaneous application has been filed seeking rectification of mistake in the order of this Tribunal dt.14.06.2018. 2. At the outset, the learned Advocate Shri P.V. Shetty for the Applicant submits that even though the issue of notional interest and revenue neutrality ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e have carefully considered the submissions advanced by both sides. All issues raised by the Appellant have been considered while passing the order. Hence, reconsideration of the issues again would amount to review of the order dt.14.06.2018 which is contrary to the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in RDC Concrete's case (supra). 5. In the result, the MA(ROM) is rejected. (Dic ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|