9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (1) TMI 1558X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t : Shri L. Nandakumar, AC (AR) ORDER The above application for condonation of delay is filed by the applicant seeking to condone the delay of 1103 days in filing the appeal. 2. On behalf of the applicant, ld. counsel Shri Derrick Sam appeared and argued the matter. The impugned order was received by the appellant on 27.9.2015. The receipt was not brought to the knowledge of the management sinc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the impugned order is dated 15.3.2015 and was served on the appellant within one week's time. It is wrong to say that the appellant has received the copy of the order only on 27.9.2015 after almost six months. Even after receiving the copy of the order, there is a delay of 1103 days in filing the appeal as stated by the appellant. The appellant has not put forward sufficient cause for condoning t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... has left the services, the appellant would have made arrangements and entrusted another person with the duties that were carried on by the assistant who has left. This part, even after the said assistant has left the services, there is a huge delay on the part of the appellant to file the appeal. The contention that the managing director was out of India in relation with organizing trade fair etc. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
