TMI Blog2019 (5) TMI 370X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... isions of the Tribunal - reliance placed in the case of COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS, AURANGABAD VERSUS ENDURANCE TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD [ 2015 (6) TMI 82 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] - credit allowed - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. - E/21847/2018-SM - Final Order No. 20393/2019 - Dated:- 3-5-2019 - MR. S.S GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER MR. Raghavendra, Advo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... long with applicable interest and imposition of penalty. The original authority vide order dated 9.6.2017 confirmed demand of CENVAT credit of ₹ 2,64,384/- along with applicable interest and imposition of penalty of ₹ 26,438/-. Aggrieved by the said order, appellant filed appeal before the Commissioner (A), who rejected the same. 3. Heard both the parties and perused the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r Ltd.: 2018 (11) GSTL 317 (Tri.-Del.) CCE vs. Jindal Aluminium Ltd.: 2017 (5) GSTL 307 (Tri.-Bang) CCE vs. Endurance Technology Pvt. Ltd.: 2017 (52) STR 361 (Bom.) Parry Engineering Electronics Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE: 2015 (40) STR 243 (Tri.-LB) Jindal Stainless Ltd. vs. CCE, Rohtak: 2015 (329) ELT 302 (Tri.-Del.) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
