2017 (10) TMI 1455

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Appellant. Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy, JC (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER The facts of the case are that the appellant as a Floating Production Unit (FPU) was engaged in offshore for drawing crude oil from subsea wells in sea and processes and transfers the processed crude oil through a buoy into a vessel called Floating Store and Offloading Unit (FSO) through which the crude is further tr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e impugned order. 2. On behalf of the appellant, Ld. Counsel Ms. Radhika Chandrasekar submitted that the above issue stands settled by the decision of this Tribunal in their own case as reported in 2012-TIOL-1874-CESTAT-MAD = 2012 (28) S.T.R. 622 (Tri.-Chennai) and prays that the impugned order may be set aside and the appeal be allowed. 3. Ld. AR Shri K. Veerabhara Reddy submits that the above .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X