TMI Blog2019 (6) TMI 418X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sequence of this case only points towards the appellants trying to take the Bench for granted and make a mockery of the entire system. I cannot allow such travesty of justice. The review application alongwith the condonation of delay for which no cogent reason has been given, is therefore dismissed as rejected. - MP-FE-441/JL/2019 (COD) MP-FE-403/JL/2019 (Review) (Amended) MP-FE-342/JL/2018 (Review), MP-FE-442/JL/2019 (COD) MP-FE-404/JL/2019 (Review) (Amended) MP-FE-343/JL/2018 (Review) And FPA-FE-267/JL/2008 And FPA-FE-268/JL/2008 - - - Dated:- 6-6-2019 - Smt. Ananya Ray Member For the Appellants : Shri R.S. Gill, Advocate, Shri Mohd. Saqib, Advocate For the Respondent : Mrs. Aagam Kaur, Legal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n the meantime, one of the appellants i.e. Mrs. Indu Sachdeva (FPA-FE- 268/JL/2008) had moved the Punjab Haryana High Court and the Hon ble Court had quashed the order dated 14.07.2009 in reference to the appellant Mrs. Indu Sachdeva. The said review petition was disposed of by the Appellate Tribunal s order 24.06.2015 which is a very detailed order which after going through the entire gamut of pleadings of the appellants rejected their review petition. The Appellate Tribunal had inter alia , noted in the said order as follows: The review petition which has been filed with a delay of almost five years and the earlier modification application has not been pressed therefore we do not find it a fit case to al ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gone through as is apparent from the brief facts points towards their utter disregard for law or any legal procedure. She also stated that there is no provision for review of a review order and they had the option to move the High Court if they were aggrieved by the review order dated 24.06.2015. Since they did not do so they do not have the option legally to file another review petition as the earlier review order has become final. She also stated that as they have not pre-deposited the amount as directed in the Tribunal s stay order dated 14.07.2009 read with the review order dated 24.06.2015, the appeals are liable to be dismissed. 5. I have examined the records as well as heard the parties at length. There ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
