TMI Blog1995 (11) TMI 85X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t, C. C. Nos. 58 of 1988, 57 of 1988 and 59 of 1988, respectively, on the file of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offences)'s Court, Ernakulam. These cases are referred to the Division Bench on the basis of the order of reference passed by Dhinakar J. in order to settle the apparent conflict between the decisions in Premier Breweries Ltd. v. Deputy CIT [1994] 207 ITR 871 (Ker) a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... reduction to the assessee in the quantum of assessment. The order imposing penalty was taken up in appeal and the appellate authority has held, that there is no concealment at all and there is no case for levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. So, the penalties have been cancelled and annexure-B is the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). Regarding th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... impressed with the arguments. Each case will have to be decided on the facts of the case. Generally, it cannot be said that the prosecution will not be maintainable and the same is to be quashed the moment the appellate authority cancels the order imposing penalty. Every case will have to be considered separately and a decision will have to be taken according to the facts of each case. In these ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... unds mentioned by them in the criminal miscellaneous cases, the trial court will consider the same and pass orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of filing such application. The trial court may not proceed further in the complaints without taking a decision on the application to be filed by the petitioners for the above purpose. The criminal mi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
