Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (7) TMI 647

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... fore the first Appellate Authority. However, we take note of the fact that, the authorities have not considered the question whether there occurred any suppression in the sale turnover with respect to the quantity of goods received under stock transfer, with respect to which the difference was detected. The evasion or escapement of tax can be attributed only if there is any specific allegation that there occurred a suppression in disclosing the sales turnover, because the taxable event at the hands of the assessee is the point of sale. Matter remanded for fresh consideration. - O. T (Rev) No. 48 of 2019 - - - Dated:- 26-6-2019 - MR C. K. ABDUL REHIM AND MR R. NARAYANA PISHARADI, JJ. For The APPELLANT : ADVS. SR .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ounts and any proper reconciliation statement along with supporting documents, to prove their contentions. Therefore it was found that, the difference occurred in the stock transfer accounted was not properly explained. Hence the additions made based on the above defects were upheld. 3. Before the Tribunal, the assessee contended that, the Assessing Authority as well as the first Appellate Authority had failed to consider the explanations offered with respect to the difference in the value of the goods accounted when compared with the value reflected in the Form-F declarations. The assessee had produced a statement, which is marked as Annexure-C, along with an argument note. It was contended that the said statement will refl .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... raised are now pursued against the impugned order of the Tribunal. 5. Heard counsel for the appellant and Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 6. We are convinced that there occurred a failure on the part of the revision petitioner /assessee to reconcile the difference detected in accounted value of the goods received under stock transfer, by producing any proper documents in proof of the same, either before the Assessing Authority or before the first Appellate Authority. However, we take note of the fact that, the authorities have not considered the question whether there occurred any suppression in the sale turnover with respect to the quantity of goods received under stock transfer, with respec .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... entire goods received under stock transfer. Hence, the above revision is hereby allowed and the assessment made with respect to the year 2008-09 is hereby quashed, to the extent of additions made based on defect No. I noted in the order of assessment, which was confirmed by the first Appellate Authority as well as by the Appellate Tribunal. The matter is remanded for completing fresh assessment on the above said point. Fresh orders or assessment in this regard shall be passed by the Assessing Authority, after affording an opportunity to the assessee, at the earliest possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. - - TaxTMI - TMITax - CST, VAT & Sales Tax .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates