Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (7) TMI 718

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... SATYAWATI TONDON AND OTHERS [ 2010 (7) TMI 829 - SUPREME COURT] , has held that, with regard to matters pertaining to taxes, cess etc., i.e., fiscal law in general, the rule of alternate remedy should be applied very strictly or in other words the rule should be applied with utmost rigour. This Court is of the considered opinion that this is a fit case to relegate the writ petitioner to alternate remedy i.e., statutory appeal (under Section 51 of TNVAT Act) to the jurisdictional Appellate Deputy Commissioner. If the writ petitioner chooses to avail alternate remedy, it is open to the writ petitioner to seek condonation of delay subject to the time periods prescribed under Section 51 of TNVAT Act. Besides seeking condonation of dela .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 16. 4. Subject matter of the instant writ petitions arises under 'Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 (TN Act 32/2006)' ( which shall be hereinafter referred to as 'TNVAT Act' for brevity), as well as the rules thereunder i.e., 'Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007 '(which shall hereinafter be referred to as 'TNVAT Rules'). To be noted, TNVAT Rules is a set of rules which is subordinate legislation made by the Government under rule making power vested in it by Section 81 of TNVAT Act. 5. Writ petitioner is a registered dealer under TNVAT Act on the file of respondent. Writ petitioner is in the business of dealing in stainless steel, ferrous and non-ferrous metals and business .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... te cancelled dealers and mismatch, judgment of Ho'nble Supreme Court of India in State of Maharashtra Vs. Suresh Trading company reported in 1998 109 STC 439 (SC) and judgment of this Court in M/s.JKM Graphics Solutions Private Limited [ M/s.JKM Graphics Solutions Private Limited Vs. The Commercial Tax Officer, Vepery Assessment Circle, Chennai-6 ] reported in 99 VST 343 have not been adhered to. To be noted, with regard to registration cancelled dealer issue, Suresh Trading company principle and with regard to mismatch, M/s.JKM Graphics Solutions Private Limited principle have been relied on. 9. Responding to the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for writ petitioner, learned Government Advocat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ured that the registration of the dealer has been in force. Further in support of their contention, they have filed the copies of tax invoice, issued by their sellers and bank statement. Further they have cited case laws pronounced by the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in their support. 4. Further, the dealer was requested to produce the profit and loss account and balance sheet for verification which was not produced at the time of inspection. It is also proposed to levy penalty/interest under Section 27 of the Act at the appropriate rate, if applicable. Accordingly a notice was issued on 24.04.2017 mentioning the above defects. Further an opportunity of personal hearing was afford to th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... impugned orders under Section 51 of TNVAT Act and the appeal lies to the jurisdictional appellate Deputy Commissioner. This takes us to the issue of exercise of writ jurisdiction notwithstanding alternate remedy. 11. There is a long line of authorities of Hon'ble Supreme Court on this aspect of the matter i.e, exercise of writ jurisdiction notwithstanding alternate remedy. To put these principles in a nutshell, it can be said that rule of alternate remedy is not an absolute rule. In other words, it is not a rule of compulsion, but it is a rule of discretion. Though it is a rule of discretion, Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satyawati Tondon case (United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon and others reported in (2010) 8 SC .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... entire paragraph no.4 of the second impugned order which have been extracted and reproduced supra, in the considered opinion of this Court, it cannot be gainsaid that the Suresh Trading company principle with regard to purchase from registration cancelled dealers and M/s.JKM Graphics Solutions Private Limited principle with regard to mismatch, have been given a go-by as respondent has embarked upon the exercise in accordance with the principles in Suresh Trading company and M/s.JKM Graphics Solutions Private Limited, based on the response of the writ petitioner i.e., response to revisional notice. However, as would be evident from the submissions of the learned counsel for writ petitioner as alluded to supra, the case of the wr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates