TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 1790X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 014 (1) TMI 502 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT ] wherein it is categorically held that in the case of delayed deposit of employees contribution to PF, the same will not be deductable in computing income under section 28 of the Act. The law so laid down by the Hon ble jurisdictional High Court is binding on us. The mere fact that an appeal against the said decision is pending before the Hon ble Supreme Court ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ₹ 21,23,948/- (for the A.Y. 2013-14), for the late payment of Employees Contribution to PF/ESI. 3. Learned representatives fairly agree that the aforesaid issue is squarely covered against the assessee by Hon ble jurisdictional High Court s judgment in the case of CIT vs. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation, 366 ITR 170 (Guj.), wherein it is categorically held that in the ca ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nter alia, in the cases of State of Manipur vs. ThingujamBrojenMeetai, (1996) 9 SCC 29; Om Prakash Gargi v. State of Punjab, (1996) 11 SCC 399 and Sun Export Corpn v. Collector of Customs, AIR 1997 SC 2658. We, therefore, see no legally sustainable merit in the case of the assessee and, respectfully following the judgment of Hon ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Gujarat State Road Trans ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
