Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (8) TMI 45

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sioner in his order in that case. It was further in evidence that neither the assessee nor the person to whom the assessee had sold different plots of land had, at any time, made any attempt to put the land to non-agricultural use. Therefore we are of the considered opinion that the impugned land on which Ghas is shown as per revenue record was in the nature of agricultural land on which agricultural activities were being carried out in the form of grass and same was irrigated by well . Therefore, the assessee is entitled for deduction u/s.54B, accordingly this ground of appeal is allowed in the appeal of the assessee. - I.T.A. No.92/SRT/2018 Assessment Year : 2012-13 - - - Dated:- 26-7-2019 - Shri Bhavnesh Saini, Judicial Member And Shri O.P.Meena, Accountant Member Assessee by Shri Mehul R Shah CA Revenue by Shri S.R.Meena Sr.DR ORDER O.P.Meena, AM: 1. The appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-3, Surat(in short the CIT(A) ) dated 28.11.2017 pertaining to Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The grounds raised by the Assessee read as under : .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed details and under the bonafide impression that the agricultural land located at village Utran is not subject to long term capital gain for the reasons that the assessee land is covered by Clause (b) sub-clause (iii) of section 2(14) of the I.T.Act. 5. The ld.CIT(A) observed that the only issue involved in the appeal is the addition of ₹ 2,42,91,150/- under the head LTCG there have been claims, revised claims, additional claims by the appellant before the ld.Assessing Officer and before the ld.CIT(A). The appellant filed the Return of Income showing capital gain and claimed deduction u/s.54F and 54B against same. Subsequently, the assessee filed revised return showing Nil capital gain claiming that the sold by him is agricultural land exempt from development of capital asset u/s.2(14) of the Act. The Assessing Officer has written letter to local authorities i.e. SUDA and SMC to ascertain the distance of the land from Surat Municipality Limits. From the report of SUDA of local authorities, the Assessing Officer found that the land of the appellant falls within the limits of SMC, so he rejected the claim of the assessee and also denied the deduction u/s.54F 54B .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to the assessee who sell agricultural land and reinvest the same sale proceeds in another agricultural land, hence a liberal approach is required. Further, the Assessing Officer has based on his observation of the Return of Income of subsequent assessment years and not earlier years. No comments have been offered regarding the extract of land records in Form No.7/12 of both the lands. The lands may be used for agricultural purpose even then the assessee may not derive agricultural income. The authentic and primary document to be seen in this regard is land revenue records, as per the Form No.7/12 produced the old land was used for growing Ghas/Grass and also had irrigational facilities of well. The new land is used for growing sugarcane/shirdi. Therefore, the issue is to be decided is whether grass or ghas mentioned in Form No.7/12 indicates agricultural use of the land. The ld.CIT(A) opined that unlike the mention of agricultural crops such as maize, sugarcane etc., the mention of Ghas/Grass in Form No.7/12 does not automatically prove the agricultural activities unless some corroboration is provided by the appellant, hence ld.CIT(A) held that conditions u/s.54B are not fulfille .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ii. As per Ind AS 41 Biological asset means: Biological asset is defined as a living plant or animal iii. It is further submitted that as per Lexico Oxford dictionary, plant means: A living organism of the kind exemplified by trees, shrubs, herbs, grasses, ferns, and mosses, typically growing in a permanent site, absorbing water and inorganic substances through its roots, and synthesizing nutrients in its leaves by photosynthesis using the green pigment chlorophyll. g. Considering the above definition, it is clear that grass is a biological asset and when there is transformation of soil into grass i.e from one biological asset to another biological asset, it shall be construed to be through agricultural activity more so when it is also mentioned in revenue records that the irrigation is through well and other irrigation methods which is accepted by the Ld CIT(A) and hence the deduction may please be allowed u/s.54B. h. Further, it is to be appreciated that Further, reliance is also placed on the decision of Emperor vs Probhat Chandra Barua dated 08.06.1921 (1924) ILR 51 Cal 504] wherein it was held that the activity of pasturing i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a well. Further, the ld.Counsel also submitted copy of sale deed placed at paper book, page 87 to 106 in which page 100 contains a photograph of land under consideration. The perusal of which shows that the land was being cultivated. The ld.Counsel further referred decision of Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Emperor vs. Probhat Chandra Barua [1924] 1 ITC 2874 (CAL) in which a question was arosed wherein the commissioner was of the opinion that pasturage being a branch of agriculture rent received from the use of assessee s forest as pasture was not assessable. However, it was held that income from pasturage was derived from land which was used for agricultural purposes and was, therefore in the case of a permanently settled state within the exemption given by section 4(3)(viii) of 1922 Act to agricultural income as defined by section 2(1)(viii). Income from pasturage was derived from land which was used for agricultural purposes and was, therefore, in the case of permanently settled estate, within the exemption given by section 4(3)(viii) of 1922 Act to agricultural income as defined by section 2(1)(a). In the circumstances that such income was derived from fees .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates