Tax Management India. Com
                        Law and Practice: A Digital eBook ...

Latest Cases

TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals SMS News Articles
Highlights
D. Forum
What's New

Share:      

        Home        
 

TMI Blog

Home List
← Previous Next →

2019 (8) TMI 503

..... the addition of this amount. Therefore, the factum of obtaining loan is proved. Considering all the assessee could not controvert the finding of the authorities below in respect of the evidences gathered during the search which proves receipt of loan in cash, therefore, we do not see any reason to interfere in the finding of the authorities below. The grounds raised in this appeal are dismissed. Levy of penalty u/s 271E - violation of provision of section 269T - repayment of loan was made in cash - HELD THAT:- There is nothing on record suggesting that the loan amount was repaid in cash by the assessee. The revenue has considered the terms of loan as if the same has been repaid in cash. There is no receipt by the person who has given loan t .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

..... f the case and in law, the learned A.O. erred in making a scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act and wrongly assumed loans and advance of ₹ 10.00 lacs from L.N. Gupta, without reason and open the case u/s 148 of the Act. 3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned A.O. erred in imposing penalty of section 271D of ₹ 10.00 lacs without appropriate reasons and justification. 4. Because the Ld. Commissioner IT (Appeals) has dismissed the appeal of assessee and confirmed the additions of ₹ 10,00,000.00 lacs as cash deposits without appropriate opportunity of hearing. 5. The appellant craves leave to add/alter any of the grounds of appeal before or at the time of hearing. 2. Briefly state .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

..... hich are reproduced as under: 4. Ld. D.R. opposed these submissions and supported the order of the authorities below. Ld. D.R. relied on the provisions of section 271D of the Act and submitted that there is no ambiguity either on facts or on law. Therefore, the A.O. was justified in imposing the penalty. 5. We have heard the rival submissions, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. During the course of hearing, Ld. Counsel for the assessee fairly conceded that the assessee has not challenged the addition of this amount. Therefore, the factum of obtaining loan is proved. Considering the rival submissions and the facts available on record, the assessee could not controvert the finding o .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

..... loan was made in cash. Before the A.O., it was submitted by the assessee that there is no evidence suggesting that the loan was repaid in cash. However, the A.O. did not accept the contention of the assessee and proceeded to impose penalty u/s 271E of the Act. The assessee preferred an appeal before Ld. CIT(A), who sustained the imposition of penalty. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the penalty has been levied purely on the guess work. He relied on the provisions of section 271E of the Act and also the provisions of section 269T. He submitted that the penalty can be levied only in the event where the assessee has repaid the loan in cash. It is not the case where the authorities below have found any evidence of making repayment o .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

 

 

← Previous Next →

 

 

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || Database || Members || Refer Us ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.
|| Blog || Site Map - Recent || Site Map ||