TMI Blog2019 (8) TMI 634X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e accepted as a general rule on the basis of relying upon decision. The petitioner approached the Additional Secretary to the Central Government. The Additional Secretary rejected it in a cavalier fashion we cannot but help deprecate such an approach - The official could not have summarily distinguished a binding judgment of the Supreme Court. The impugned order has resulted in the lack of reme ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Advocate, is directed to accept notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. With consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition was heard finally. 4. The impugned order in this case disposed of two revision applications under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Briefly the petitioner was aggrieved by an order in original appeal dated 8th February ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion cannot be accepted as a general rule on the basis of relying upon decision. The petitioner approached the Additional Secretary to the Central Government. The Additional Secretary rejected it in a cavalier fashion we cannot but help deprecate such an approach. The official could not have summarily distinguished a binding judgment of the Supreme Court. The impugned order ha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
