Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (4) TMI 1744

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e-tax (Investigation- II), Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi, that the assessee has received accommodation entries from certain companies floated by Shri Surendra Kumar Jain group of cases which was detected during the course of search and post search inquiries conducted in the case of Shri Surendra Kumar Jain group of cases, the Assessing Officer reopened the assessment by recording reasons and by issue of notice u/s 148. Subsequently, the assessee asked for reasons recorded which was provided to the assessee. The assessee filed objections to the notice issued u/s 148 which was rejected by the Assessing Officer. Subsequently, during the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noted that the assessee has received share capita .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... illegal, without jurisdiction, mechanical, without application of mind and unsustainable in law as well as on merits. 2. That under the facts and circumstances, approval U/s. 151 of the superior authorities is not accordance with law and otherwise also mechanical and without application of mind, making the re - asstt. proceedings un - sustainable in law 3. That under thefacts andcircumstances, addition of Rs. 25 lacs under section 68 for the share capital / share premium received from Shalini Holdings Ltd. by holding the same as received from alleged entry operator is illegal and unsustainable in law as well as on merits. 4. That under thefacts andcircumstances, addition of Rs. 10 lacs under section 68 for the share capital / shar .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ble High Court has held that the CIT is required to apply his mind to the proposal put up to him for approval in the light of the material relied upon by the Assessing Officer. The said power cannot be exercised casually and in a routine manner. Referring to the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Pr. CIT vs. N.C. Cables reported in 391 ITR 11 (Del), he submitted that when there is no proper application of mind by the sanctioning authority for issuing notice u/s 147 or 148, reassessment proceedings are not valid. In this case also the approval u/s 151 was given as 'approved.' Referring to the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of German Remedies Ltd. vs. DCIT (2006) 287 ITR 494 (Bom), he submit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... P); iv) Raj Kishore Prasad, 88 CTR (All) 152; and v) Shri Amarlal Bajaj vs. ACIT, ITA No.611/Mum/2004, Order dated 24.07.2013 (ITAT, Mumbai) 6. He accordingly submitted that on this issue itself the reassessment proceedings should be quashed because the ld. CIT while giving approval has given the same in a mechanical manner and without application of mind. 7. The ld. DR, on the other hand, supported the order of the CIT(A) on this issue. The ld. counsel for the assessee, in his rejoinder, submitted that although it was argued before the CIT(A) on the issue of approval u/s 151 of the IT Act, however, the ld.CIT(A) has conveniently ignored the same while deciding the issue of validity of reassessment proceedings. 8. I have consi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Pr. CIT while giving approval has simply mentioned as under:- "Yes. I am satisfied." 10. I find, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of United Electrical Company Pvt. Ltd. (supra) while deciding an identical issue has held that the power vested in the commissioner u/s 151 to grant or not to grant approval to the Assessing Officer to reopen an assessment is coupled with a duty. The commissioner is required to apply his mind to the proposal put up to him for approval in the light of the material relied upon by the Assessing Officer. That power cannot be exercised casually and in a routine manner. Accordingly, the Hon'ble High Court quashed the notice, since there was no proper application of mind by the Addl.CIT. 11. I f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates