TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 1805X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the CODS-2018 or file the necessary documents as required for dissolution for the Company under Section 248(2) as stated above; in addition to other consequences, the petitioners would also be liable to be prosecuted for contempt of Court. HELD THAT:- This petition can be disposed of with the direction that respondents will follow the directives contained in Sandeep Singh. It is made clear ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2.1 Learned counsel for the petitioners says that the issue which arises for consideration in this case is covered by the judgment of another Single Judge of this Court dated 21.12.2017, passed in W.P.(C)11381/2017 titled: Sandeep Singh Anr. v. Registrar of Companies Ors. This aspect is not disputed by the counsel for the respondents. Therefore, waiting for a counter affidavit would serve no ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... oned in Annexure P-7 (collectively). 4.1. Counsel for the petitioners says that since the petitioners' names were included in the impugned list of disqualified directors for the financial years 2014-16, their role as Directors is impeded insofar as the other companies are concerned which are active and running (Annexure P-7 collectively). 4.2. Counsel for the petitioners says ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in consonance with the provisions of Section 248 (2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and under the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018 within a period of ten days from today. 5.2 In order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the impugned list, insofar as it concerns the petitioners, will remain stayed till 31.3.2018 or, till such time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
