TMI Blog2013 (5) TMI 1016X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Kureshi This petition is converted from Tax Appeal No.55 of 2013. Under challenge is an order dated 8.12.2011 dismissing the petitioners Tax Appeal by the Tribunal due to the petitioners inability to satisfy the predeposit requirement. The requirement of pre-deposit itself was challenged by the petitioner in Special Civil Application No.8389 of 2011 which was disposed of on 8.9.11. Th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the petitioners stated that in view of the attachment of the Department, the petitioners could not identify any buyer. Be that as it may, as of now, neither the petitioners are able to satisfy the pre-deposit requirement on their own nor are they able to bring any genuine buyer. Under the circumstances, this petition is disposed of with following directions: (1)Time for satisfying the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
