TMI Blog2015 (9) TMI 1662X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lfillment of the conditions prescribed by law - Revenue contended that, the judgement of Supreme Court was not correctly interpreted in the COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CUSTOM HOUSE VERSUS M/S. CITY OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND OTHERS [ 2013 (4) TMI 655 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] - HELD THAT:- The matter being covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin vs. Cit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... .2013. The submission of the learned counsel for the Department is that the said judgment has not correctly interpreted the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 3. On our query as to whether any Special Leave Petition was preferred against the same, learned counsel states that a Special Leave Petition has been preferred, but has still not been numbered. This is the position 2= years afte ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... erms whereof the goods have been released on payment of duty. 6. We have set out the aforesaid facts, though really speaking for disposal of the appeals, it is suffice to say that the matter being covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin vs. City Office Equipment (supra), these appeals are liable to be dismissed in terms of the said judgm ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
