2015 (9) TMI 1662

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Respondent : Mr. N. Viswanathan, Mr. S. Baskaran & Mr. B. Sathish Sundar JUDGMENT Mr. Sanjay Kishan Kaul We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. It cannot be disputed by the learned counsel for the appellant/Department that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin vs. City Office Equipment .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .2013 (Shrishti Digital Solution v. Additional Commissioner of Customs, Chennai, reported in 2013 (298) ELT 197). On our query, it is stated that in respect of that judgment also, a writ appeal has been filed, but that is still at SR stage (i.e. unnumbered) for 2= years! All one can say, the Department is consistent in its actions and delays. 5. In the present appeals, we are concerned with the d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X