TMI Blog2019 (9) TMI 1030X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... appellant is not interested in pursuing the impugned matter. Perusal of Order of adjudicating authority below reveals that the Department observed mis-declaration as far as the number of cartons/packages imported and the weight thereof is concerned, as were imported by the appellant vide Bill of Entry No. 8472911 dated 03.03.2015. Department also observed the under-valuation of the consignments ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... der dated 03.07.2019 appellant was directed to provide the legible copies of the documents particularly Order-in-Original. But the appellant failed even to provide the said legible copies on the adjourned date i.e. 25.07.2019. Rather had again sought an adjournment. It becomes clear that more than a dozen adjournments have been sought by the appellant in the present case. The said conduct of the a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dated 20.03.2015. Thus, seeing from the merits as well we do not find any justification in the impugned Appeal. 3. As a result of entire above discussion, the Appeal in hand is dismissed not only for want of the compliance and non-prosecution on part of the appellant but also for his absence as on date and for no merits in this Appeal to his favour. [Dictated and pronou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
