9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (9) TMI 1186X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... spondent ORDER AJAY SHARMA: This appeal has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 31/03/2018 passed by Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise Commissionerate, Belapur in Order-in-Appeal No. V2 (A) STII / 360 / 2016-17. 2. The Appellants are engaged in providing various services such as construction of residential complex, renting of immovable property etc. During the course of audit, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y of Appeal No. ST/86913/2018; titled as M/s. Kalpataru Ltd. vs. Commr. of CGST, Mumbai was allowed by of remand by this Tribunal vide order dated 21.8.2018, by which this Tribunal remanded the matter to the original adjudicating authority for passing a speaking order. According to him, similarly in the present matter also the authorities below failed to give any specific finding except stating ag ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s the learned chartered account submitted that all the evidence were submitted but both the authorities below failed to look into the same. Be that as it may, without going into the merits of the matter, following the order dated 21.8.2018 of this Tribunal in Appeal No. ST/86913/2018 for the period 2010 to 2014, I am inclined to remand the matter back to the original authority for the period 2014- ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
