TMI Blog1995 (12) TMI 407X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ourt in W.P. No.12533/86 dated November 24, 1994. The respondent and others challenged the validity of Sections 24 and 25 of Cone Workers and Cinema Theatre Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act (50 of 1981) (for short 'the Act') and the notification of Government of India bearing No.35016 issued by Ministry of Labour on April 30, 1986. The Division Bench while upholding the validity of t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... have it credited to the account maintained by the appropriate authority in that behalf. It is contended for the respondents that the High Court has granted the relief taking into consideration that some workmen had retired and it would be inequitable to deduct from the meagre wages of existing employees with retrospective period. Therefore, the High Court directed deduction of their shar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the enforcement of the notification as held by this Court. It is, therefore, necessary that from the date on which the respective owners of the theaters or the licencees, who had filed the writ petition in the High Court, are made liable to deposit their share of contribution towards provident fund account under the scheme. We are issuing the order under Article 142 of the Constitutio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
