Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (11) TMI 733

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r certain Dietary supplements classifying the same under CTH 21061000 through CHA M/S R U Imports-Exports Pvt. Ltd. The Consignment was examined by the Inspector on first check basis on the directions of the Superintendent "Please open and examine 10% of the total no. of packages subject to a minimum of 2 packages and check declaration. Please verify that the goods are as per invoice, packing list, B/E and the B/L. Please ensure compliance to CCR/Target Intervention instructions before o/c. Please check NOC from PHO/FSSAI or check previous 5 NOC as per DGFT Circular No. 25/2004 and 37/2004 for PHO waiver." The consignment was examined and cleared with examination report bearing "O/E 10% of the Goods in presence of CHA representative and fou .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o. 2 took a loan of Rs. 10 Lakhs from M/S Ranbir Finance Company and rest of the four lakhs were arranged by the CHA. He was not aware of the origin of the goods as no certificate of origin was available. That neither his firm was registered with FSSAI nor has obtained NOC prior to customs clearance of the goods. The appellant no. 2 voluntarily deposited Rs. 10 Lakh on account of anticipated adjudication levies. The appellant No. 1 is the Director of CHA firm who has undertaken the clearance work of the consignment that he was aware of requirement of NOC from FSSAI but he did not obtain and instead submitted five previous bills of entry in respect of same goods and same supplier for waiver; he has wrongly mentioned the country of origin as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Section 25 of FSS Act, 2006 "25. All imports of articles of food to be subject to this Act. (1) No person shall import into India - (i) any unsafe or misbranded or sub-standard food or food containing extraneous matter; (ii) any article of food for the import of which a licence is required under any Act or rules or regulations, except in accordance with the conditions of the licence; and (iii) any article of food in contravention of any other provision of this Act or of any rule or regulation made there under or any other Act." Para 7 of CBEC Circular No. 03/2011-Cus a) consignments of high risk food items, as listed in DGFT Policy Circular No. 39(RF-2003)/2002-2007 dated 14/06/2004 (as may be modified from time to ti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ceived from FSSAI from time to time. iii. In case, a sample drawn from a food item in a particular consignment ` fails to meet the prescribed standards, the Customs would place the import of the said consignment on alert, discontinue random checking for import of such food items and revert to the procedure of compulsory checking. The system of random sampling for import of such food items would be restored only if the test results of the samples drawn from the 5 consecutive consignments re-establish that the food items are in conformity with the prescribed standards. " 4. Vide impugned order, the learned Commissioner found that the conduct of the Inspector and Superintendent could not be considered sufficient to hold that they had abette .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ty. It has been submitted by Shri Anand Kadiyan that the penalty under Section 112A of the Customs Act, 1962 should have been equivalent to the declared value of the import consignment rather than the market value of the import consignment. We find that the argument made by the appellant is not legally sustainable as the Customs Act under Section 112A provides that penalty under the Section should not exceed the value of the goods. Since, the import consignment falls under the category of the prohibited goods and it has also been found that the value declared by the importer is not correct. The seizure value of these goods have been taken as market value since as the goods are of prohibited nature, they are certainly to fetch high margin of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates