9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (12) TMI 67X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r. Devadatt Kamat, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. Aditya Bhat, Adv. Mr. Javedur Rahman, Adv. Mr. Manendra Pal Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Inamdar, Adv. Mr. Ali A. Rahim, Adv. Ms. Shrinidhi Rao, Adv. For the Respondent : Ms. Vanita Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Adv. Ms. Shweta Kabra, Adv. M/s Khaitan & Co., AOR Mr. M.L. Lahoty, Adv. Mr. Anchit Sripat, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, AOR ORDER ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the appellant - State, has contested and opposed the aforesaid contentions of the learned counsel for the respondents. He submits that what was purchased was coffee beans and what was exported was cured coffee beans or coffee powder. Further, what was purchased could not have been consumed as a beverage, whereas what was exported could be consumed as a beverage. Sections 5(1) and (3) of the Cent ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , and was for the purpose of complying with, the agreement or order for or in relation to such export." The aforesaid section 5(3) begins with a non-obstante clause in relation to sub-section (1) of section 5. Section 5(1) deals with a situation where the sale or purchase itself occasions such export. Obviously, in the cases before us what is relevant is sub-section (3) of section 5 because the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
