TMI Blog2019 (12) TMI 268X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ft the institution after new members were elected as the managing committee. That being the case, the question of appellant invoking the principle of capital asset does not arise. It may have been a different matter if it was a case of life time appointment of the appellant as Secretary of the concerned Institution. No such evidence was produced by the appellant before the assessing officer or bef ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The issue involved in this appeal is essentially questioning the finding of fact recorded by the authorities below whether the amount received by the appellant in the sum of ₹ 37,54,266/- (Rupees Thirty Seven Lakh Fifty Four Thousand Two Hundred Sixty Six only) is capital receipt or revenue receipt in the hands of the a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... been a different matter if it was a case of life time appointment of the appellant as Secretary of the concerned Institution. No such evidence was produced by the appellant before the assessing officer or before us. 5. Taking over-all view of the matter, we uphold the conclusion reached by the High Court that the amount received in the hands of appellant-assessee cannot be treated a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
