TMI Blog2019 (12) TMI 390X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... decided against appellant. - Excise Appeal No. 88298 of 2018, 88299 of 2018 - A/86724-86725/2019 - Dated:- 27-9-2019 - HON BLE DR. SUVENDU KUMAR PATI, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) Shri H.S. Shirsat, Consultant for the Appellant Shri Sanjay Hasija, Superintendent, Authorised Representative for the Respondent ORDER In these two appeals, appellant had assailed the order passed by the Commissioner of CGST Central Excise (Appeals), Nagpur-I vide Order-in-Appeal Nos. NGP-I/APPL/137/2017-18 dated 04.05.2018 and NGP-I/APPL/139/2017-18 dated 04.05.2018 rejecting refund claims of the appellant which were allowed by the Jurisdictional Excise Officer on CENVAT credit on inputs and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ct nor the decision in the Phoenix Industries Pvt. Ltd. case would be applicable to the appellant in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court confirming the finding made in M/s Slovak India Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Jain Vanguard Poly Butlene Ltd. He further relied on the decision of the Tribunal, Chandigarh in the case of Shree Krishna Paper Mills India Ltd. reported in [2019 (365) ELT 594 (Tri.-Chan.) to support his contention. He prayed to set aside the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). 4. In response to such submissions, learned Authorised Representative for the respondent-department Shri Sanjay Hasija, Superintendent supported the reasoning and rationality of the order passed by the Commis ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... een summarised in para 40 of the order that reads: 40. As a result of the above discussion, we answer the questions of law framed above as (a) and (b) in the negative. They have to be answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue. Questions (a) and (b) having been answered accordingly, needless to state that the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Slovak India (supra) cannot be read as a declaration of law under Article 141 of the Constitution of India. 6. In view of the finding of the Hon'ble High Court of Mumbai which had held that order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Slovak India Trading Co. (P) Ltd. (supra) cannot be read as a declaration of law sinc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
