TMI Blog2019 (4) TMI 1803X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he writ petition. The orders impugned in these appeals suffer from the aforesaid error, because, as would be clear from the perusal of the order, the High Court while passing the impugned order simply dismissed the writ petition without any discussion, finding and the reason - such order is not legally sustainable and hence deserves to be set aside. The case is remanded to the High Court for deciding the writ petition afresh, out of which these appeals arise, for its disposal in accordance with law - appeal allowed by way of remand. - Civil Appeal Nos.3448-3449 OF 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos.7837-7838 of 2014) - - - Dated:- 8-4-2019 - A M Sapre, J. UDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, 1. Leave gr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ugned order reads as under : Having gone through the impugned order, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity therein warranting interference. Findings of fact have been recorded which have not been shown perverse or contrary to material on record. I, therefore, do not find any reason to interfere. The scope of judicial review under Article 227 is very limited and narrow as discussed in detail by this Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.27433 of 1991 (Lala Ram Narain vs. Xth Additional District Judge, Moradabad Ors.) decided on 13.07.2012. There is nothing which may justify judicial review of order impugned in this writ petition in the light of exposition of law, as discussed in the above judgment. 6. The ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ee State of Maharashtra vs. Vithal Rao Pritirao Chawan, (1981) 4 SCC 129, Jawahar Lal Singh vs. Naresh Singh Ors., (1987) 2 SCC 222, State of U.P. vs. Battan Ors., (2001) 10 SCC 607, Raj Kishore Jha vs. State of Bihar Ors., (2003) 11 SCC 519 and State of Orissa vs. Dhaniram Luhar, (2004) 5 SCC 568). 10. The orders impugned in these appeals suffer from the aforesaid error, because, as would be clear from the perusal of the order, the High Court while passing the impugned order simply dismissed the writ petition without any discussion, finding and the reason. 11. We are, therefore, of the view that such order is not legally sustainable and hence deserves to be set aside. 12. In view of the foregoing discuss ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
