1993 (4) TMI 327

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd they are entitled to be treated as such. In other respects, this Court had not granted relief to other non-statutory employees while the writ petitions were pending. The petitioners' association representing the persons appointed by the commission vendors on the railway platforms on the various places also claime parity to be treated as railway catering service. This writ petition came to b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eferred as having being covered. Accordingly, it was ordered thus : There will be an order as in Madhavan v. Union of India2. Thus this Court was led to believe that the law holding the field is Madhavan's ratio (a two-Judge Bench) instead of Khan's ratio (three Judge-Bench) a binding precedent. Therefore what is prevailing law is the one laid down by this Court in M.M.R. Khan v. Union o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X