Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1992 (12) TMI 30

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... -I on October 30, 1987. The appropriate authority sent an order dated December 16, 1987, as at annexure 'E', exercising power under section 269UD(1) Of the Act purporting to make a pre-emptive purchase for the apparent consideration shown in the agreement with other statutory benefits. The petitioner being aggrieved by the action of respondent No. 2 is calling in question the constitutional validity of Chapter XX-C of the Act and the order made under section 269UD(1) of the Act. The constitutional validity of Chapter XX-C of the Act has been upheld by the Supreme Court in Transferred Case No. 26 of 1987 ( C. B. Gautam v. Union of India [1993] 199 ITR 530 ) disposed of on November 27, 1992. Thus, it is no longer open to the petitioner to c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . 392 ; AIR 1972 Mys 50, in support thereof. Under the scheme of Chapter XX-C of the Act, unless a no objection certificate is produced, the officers under the Registration Act cannot register documents purporting to transfer immovable properties exceeding Rs. 10 lakhs. In order to enable a party to obtain such a certificate, statement in Form No. 37-1 is required to be furnished. On perusal of such form and such investigation as is needed, the appropriate authority may grant a no objection certificate or pass an order under section 269UD(1) of the Act for purchase by the Central Government of the immovable property within a period of two months subject to the conditions mentioned in the proviso thereto. Precedents on the interpretation .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e the commencement of 30th day of October, 1987. If two interpretations are possible, that which advances the object of the enactment must be adopted. When performing its cognitive function of ascertaining what a statute means, the court would temper its reading by taking into account the proper context of the statute. The meaning of a word in a statute may be enlarged or restricted in order to harmonise with the legislative intent of the entire statute. It is the spirit of the statute that governs over the literary meaning. Every word takes its colour or meaning from the context in which it is used. Interpretation by definition is concerned with the ascertainment of the true meaning, and because true the meaning often differs from the lite .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... open to the Department to act upon statement in Form No. 37-1 filed by the petitioner and respondent No. 4 on October 30, 1987. It is contended that, before making the order under section 269UD neither the petitioner nor respondent No. 4 had been given a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against the order being made by the appropriate authority. This contention is not contradicted. Hence the order under section 269UD impugned herein shall stand quashed. The statement in Form No. 37-1 filed by the petitioner and respondent No. 4 on October 30, 1987, shall be treated as if it were filed today and the appropriate authority shall proceed to consider the same in the light of the order made in Transferred Case No. 26 of 1987 (see [1993] .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates