2016 (10) TMI 1295

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... der the category of Business Auxiliary Services stands finally concluded by the Tribunal in the case of MR. CHARANJEET SINGH KHANUJA AND OTHERS VERSUS CST, INDORE/LUCKNOW/JAIPUR/LUDHIANA AND OTHERS [ 2015 (6) TMI 585 - CESTAT NEW DELHI] . However, it is seen that in the same very decision, the Tribunal has observed that since there was bonafide belief in the industry itself and in as much as two v .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (Judicial) AND Hon'ble Mr. Ashok K Arya, Member (Technical) For the Appellant : None For the Respondent : Shri R. K. Mishra, DR ORDER Per Archana Wadhwa: In all these matters, appellants are unrepresented. Accordingly, we have heard Shri R.K. Mishra, DR for the Respondent. 2. The appellants were issued show cause notice on the grounds that by providing multi level .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... imitation would not be available to the Revenue. We further note that in some of the cases, demands are wholly barred by limitation, whereas in some the same are partly barred. Further, in some cases, the entire demand is within limitation period. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned orders and remand the matter to the original adjudicating authority to quantify the demands falling within the li .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X