9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (2) TMI 212X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... imathy ORDER This Writ Petition is filed for issuing a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the impugned order passed by the second respondent vide DIN & Letter No.ITBA/COM/F/17/2019-20/1023768103(1), dated 10.01.2020, mandating the petitioner to pay 20% of the disputed demand of Income Tax in respect of assessment year 2017-18 in respect to the PAN Number AHFPA4358R and to direct the first ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1. Earlier, an assessment order was passed on 11.12.2009 directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 21,58,888/-. Challenging the same, the petitioner has preferred an appeal along with the petition for stay under Section 226(6) of the Income Tax Act 1961. For the purpose of entertaining the stay petition, the respondents required the petitioner to pay 20% of the disputed demanded amount on or be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... allowed and the impugned order, dated 10.01.2020 directing the petitioner to pay 20% of the disputed demanded amount to respondents in respect of the assessment year 2017-18 is set aside. The petitioner is directed to remit a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such deposit being made by the petitioner within the time stipulated, t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
