2020 (3) TMI 1159

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... NU   JUDGMENT The petitioner is a partnership firm, engaged in the business of import of vitrified tiles, stainless steel kitchen sink, sanitary wards and goods of such nature. He has been importing goods and the goods are cleared through the Cochin Port after following due procedure of law. 2. The counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits, the Government of India, Ministry of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e goods on the premise that the invoice was not co-relating with the manufactures or the name of consignor referred in the schedule of notification. 5. It is contended that since there was spelling mistake in the name of the exporter, the aforementioned Ministry by corrigendum Ext.P9 dated 25.01.2019 rectified the spelling errors in the name of producers and exporter at Sl.No.4 of the notificatio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... here would be no useful purpose in seeking counter or keeping the writ petition pending, in view of the notification dated 14.06.2017 and corrigendum dated 25.01.2019 which is co-relating to the name of the exporter/producer in the invoices. The respondents are required to take a decision and take call for permitting the petitioner claiming Anti Dumping Duty @ 0.28 US Dollars in terms of Sl.No.4 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X