Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1991 (12) TMI 51

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e-tax Act, 1961, as in the case of the income of an individual Khasi ?" The assessee is a Khasi family. The relevant assessment year is 1980-81. The income of the assessee during the relevant previous year was Rs. 1,02,230, i.e., far in excess of the taxable limit. The assessee did not submit any return of income voluntarily under section 139(1) of the Act. It did not do so even in compliance with a notice under section 139(2) of the Act. The assessee, however, appeared before the Income-tax Officer, through its authorised representative, in response to a notice under section 142(1) of the Act for production of books of account and documents and submitted that the assessee family was not liable to be taxed under the Act as its total incom .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on) (Adaptation of Laws on Union Subjects) Order, 1974, with effect from January 21, 1972, reads as follows: "10. Incomes not included in total income.-In computing the total income of a previous year of any person, any income falling within any of the following clauses shall not be included-. . . (26) in the case of a member of a Scheduled Tribe as defined in clause (25) of article 366 of the Constitution, residing in any area specified in Part I or Part II of the Table appended to paragraph 20 of the Sixth Schedule to the Constitution or in the States of Nagaland, Manipur and Tripura or in the Union Territories of Arunachal Pradesh and Mizoram or in the areas covered by Notification No. TAD/R/35/50/109, dated the 23rd February, 1951, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... single member of the Khasi Tribe, it would have been exempt under section 10(26) of the Act. The only controversy is whether the income in the instant case having accrued not to an individual Khasi but to a Khasi family, whether this exemption will be available. In other words, whether the benefit of exemption available to a member of Khasi Tribe will be available even if the income is earned by him not as an individual but as a group of individuals comprising the members of his family. There is no dispute that all the members of the family are Khasis. We have carefully applied our mind to the controversy. The word "family" is a popular expression. It should be given a normal meaning and, should not be construed technically unless. It is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates