2020 (6) TMI 302

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... V. SRI.ANIL D. NAIR FOR THE RESPONDENT : SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC FOR INCOME TAX JUDGMENT The petitioner, a partnership firm, carrying on contract work with different clients, including the Southern Railway; one of the major clients, has approached this Court for quashing of Exts.P14 and P14A, the demand notices raised by the Income Tax Department. 2. In support of the aforementioned pray .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ition continued for every year and the petitioner had been filing applications under Section 154 of the Act for the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11, 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15, as evidenced from Exts.P2 to P6. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the rectification application, Ext.P1 was filed way back on 19.11.2010. It is also submitted that the petitioner had filed Exts.P2 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ns; particularly when Form 16A had been issued. It is yet to be decided whether the petitioner is correct or not, but there has to be a decision, in accordance with law. 4. Issue notice before admission. Sri.Christopher Abraham, learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department submits that the petitioner is not entitled to the credit as submitted, but do not deny the status of the pendency .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X